Thursday, February 4, 2016

A Peek at Student Learning; Graphs,and Notes from Schoolyard Students


What do Students Understand from Schoolyard Ecology?

A Collection of Samples of Student Work related to Harvard Forest Schoolyard Ecology studies




This illustrated poem was excerpted from  a  final report from a High School student in Jana Matthei's Notre Dame Academy Environmental Studies class in Hingham, MA.    

At Harvard Forest, we are very interested in getting a sense of the learning outcomes for students engaged in our Schoolyard Ecology projects.   One of the most direct ways to do this is to look at student work related to project themes.   Last year's blog of student samples related to the Vernal Pool project. This year, we have some samples related to the ever popular, Buds, Leaves and Global Warming project.  

Sample introduction, graphs, and conclusion from students at Notre Dame Academy:  

Harvard Forest Introduction:

Over a period of five weeks, my group and I observed two branches on our Red Maple tree. The common name is Red Maple, while the scientific name is Acer rubrum. The Red Maple normally begins budding during late winter-early spring. It buds earlier than most other trees during the springtime and it is one of the first to change color during the fall. Because the leaves on the Red Maple bud earlier than other trees, I predict that senescence will occur earlier than other trees. The Red Maple is one of the most widespread trees found in North America and can grow between 60-75 feet tall. The Red Maple is considered a deciduous tree and is best grown in wet areas. We examined the color change of the leaves and when they fell off of the trees, which marks the end of the growing period. My group and I were nicknamed, “The Tree Huggers” and on both branches we observed six different leaves. We calculated the percentage of leaves that were not green on Branch A and Branch B. Each week, my group and I recorded our outdoor observations about the weather, temperature, and how much of the leaves were eaten by insects. Our Honors Environmental science class is learning about phenology, which is the effect that climate is having on the trees, study of the life cycles, and how the leaves are changing due to climate.

Sample Graph from Student Report


Students formed conclusions about what their  tree phenology data were saying:  


Conclusion:
After reviewing the results of the other trees in my Honors Environmental Science class, I came to the realization that the Red Maple tree does not have the longest growing period. Based on the results in the table, I concluded that one of the Black Oak trees, one of the Black Birch trees and one of the Black Cherry trees began their growing period on the same day as the Red Maple tree.  The tree with the longest growing period is the Black Oak tree, while the tree with the shortest growing period is the Black Birch. The Shagbark Hickory has the earliest beginning of the growing period. Although the Red Maple tree is one of the trees that flowers earlier than most trees, it does not have the longest growing season. I predict that the Red Maple tree’s growing period varies depending on the climate in the fall and in the winter. I think that if there is a rainy spring, the leaves will begin to bud earlier verses when there is a dry spring. There are some modifications that I would make to the project. I think that students should upload information onto a class discussion board on the portal.  Everyone would be able to share information with one another about various tree growths, leaf fall, weather notes and observations. Next year, I think that students should find a way to use the excel document on the iPads because there were many technological difficulties with the computers.  


Another Sample Student Graph from Notre Dame Academy

See two complete student Phenology study reports at: 


and 


Samples of data analysis work done at Holyoke Catholic High School: 





Students in Lise Letellier's Holyoke Catholic High School freshman Environmental Science class first input field data onto an Excel worksheet including growing season calculations





Students then entered the growing season length  from larger table on this individual table in order to develop bar graph to the right.




After producing a variety of graphs, students formed a conclusion about what the data for their project was indicating.  

A student with severe learning challenges, formed the following conclusion from their study:







Conclusion


The purpose of this observational study is to determine if there are any patterns in the lengths 
of growing season of different types of trees and the different years of each tree. We are also trying to determine if the growing season length of the trees is getting shorter, longer, or staying the same over the years. At first it seemed that the data of this tree was very random and had no pattern but after comparing it to the data of other trees of the same species I can tell that the trees growing seasons are very slowly getting shorter and shorter every year and may continue to get shorter as the years go on. The average growing season of the tree is about 180 days long but shortens about 5 to 10 days every year. I think this will continue until the tree either stops producing leaves or will eventually die. The earliest growing season started for this tree was in 2012 where the leaves started to bud at around April 13th. The latest growing season it had ended was in 2013 where 100 percent of the leaves had fallen by November 2nd. The latest growing season had started was in 2014 starting at around April 28th and the earliest a growing season had ended was in 2015 ending at around October 25th. So far this information makes me assume that the older the tree gets, the growing seasons may be getting shorter and shorter every year.



An honors student formed this summary from their analysis of project data:   



Summary:
The purpose of these observations is to answer the questions of when the growing season starts and ends. It also answers how long the growing season is and if the length of the growing season is changing. In order to answer these questions data was collected on leaf growth and budburst in the spring and on the percent of leaves fallen and the tree color in the fall. This is the data collected for Tree 17. Tree 17 is a crabapple tree on Springfield Street.
Tree 17’s growing season started the earliest in 2012. The leaves started growing the earliest and were the longest this year. The buds were 100% open before the observations started. In 2013, the leaves started growing later and took longer to reach their maximum length. In 2014, the leaves took the longest to start growing and reached 100% budburst the latest. This shows that the growing season has been starting later for Tree 17 over the years.
In 2012, the leaves started falling the earliest. In 2013, the leaves started to fall the latest, but 100% of the leaves were fallen the soonest. Also in 2013, the tree took the longest to start changing color and took the longest to reach 100% not green. In 2014, the tree color started changing the earliest and reached 100% not green the earliest. In 2015, the leaves took the longest to all fall off. As years have progressed, it has taken longer for all of the leaves to fall off, except for 2012, which was in between 2014 and 2015.

There was only enough data to calculate a definite growing season for 2013 and 2014. For 2012, only the minimum growing season could be calculated. There was no data for spring 2015 so no growing season could be calculated for that year. The growing season for 2012 is equal or greater to 228 days. This is the longest of the calculated growing seasons. The growing season for 2013 is 208 days, and the growing season for 2014 was 205 days. 2014 had the shorted growing season of the calculated years. The growing season of Tree 17 decreased over time. There was a large decrease between 2012 and 2013 and a smaller decrease between 2013 and 2014.
Tree 17’s spring and fall data was compared to that of Tree 24. Both trees are crabapple trees. Both trees had their earliest budburst in 2012. In addition, for both trees, the year in which they took the longest to drop all of their leaves was 2015. Unlike Tree 17, Tree 24 started to lose its leaves earliest in 2013.
Tree 17’s data was also compared to that of Tree 12. Tree 12 is an exotic cherry. In all years, the leaves on Tree 24 started falling earlier and reached 100% fallen sooner than the leaves on Tree 17. In 2012, the budburst for Tree 17 started earlier than the budburst for Tree 24. Both trees had very rapid budburst in 2013 and 2014. In 2013, the budburst for both trees started and ended on the same dates and in 2014 the budburst started on the same date for both trees.

Overall, Tree 17’s data shows that the growing season has been starting later, ending later and that the overall growing season has been becoming shorter over time.



A "regular" level student make the following analysis:




Questions:
1. Yes, I can determine how long my tree’s growing season is. In 2012 the growing season started around April 23 and ended around October 28. In 2013, the growing season started around April 26 and ended around October 29. In 2014, the growing season began around May 8 and ended around October 31. In 2015, the growing season began around May 6 and ended on November 9. The growing season was about six months in 2012. In 2013, the growing season was about six months also. In 2014, the growing season was about a little less than six months. In 2015, the growing season was about six months also.
2. The leaves burst out first in 2013 around April 23. The leaves fell off first around in 2012. The leaves burst out last in 2014 around May 8. The leaves fell off last in 2015 around November 9.
3. In comparison to my data, Tree #4, which is a Hawthorn also, in 2012 had the same growing season. In 2013, they again have similar growing seasons. In 2014, there is no data for the start of the growing season, but they end around the same date. In 2015, tree #4’s growing season starts within a week of each other but there is no data of tree #4’s growing season ending.
4. In comparison to my data, Tree #1, which is an Eastern Hornbeam, the growing season in 2012 and 2013 started around the middle of April and ended around the middle of November. In 2014 and 2015 the growing season started around the end of April and the beginning of May and ended around the end of November. Their growing season is longer because it starts around the same time but ends later.

5. The tree’s growing season in the last four years have all been around six months, but each year the leaves burst later each year except for in 2013, and the leaves fell off later each year.


Results Statement:
The growing seasons of the trees on our campus were observed. The growing season of Tree 3 – Hawthorn in 2012 was about 190 days, in 2013 was about 180 days, in 2014 was about 180 days also, and for 2015, we were unable to calculate the data because we did not have the data entered for when the leaves were 50% fallen. Tree 20 – Red Maple’s growing season was about 185 days in 2012, 2013, and 2014. We were unable to determine the growing season for 2015 because the data was not entered for when the leaves reached 50% fallen.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In order to compare the trends discussed in the  student work above, here is a graph by John O'Keefe of his own data recorded at Harvard Forest over 26 years, up through 2015:



We'd love to hear what teachers, educators, ecologists and other students have to say about what we are learning from this work, and what remains confusing or unknown.


Please provide feedback and questions about this blog entry directly or email Pamela at: psnow@fas.harvard.edu


Teacher Overview,  Directions and Rubric, along with more student work samples are available on our website. Search for these 9 documents under Buds, Leaves and Global Warming heading beginning with Letellier. 2016.http://harvardforest.fas.harvard.edu/schoolyard/lesson-plans


To find these schools on our field site map and explore their data on our online database, go to: Schoolyard Buds and Leaves Field site Map


To see the field protocol and related materials for this Schoolyard Ecology study, go to:  http://harvardforest.fas.harvard.edu/buds-leaves-global-warming





Friday, January 29, 2016

What Does Winter Look Like in Our Schoolyard Field Sites?



Winter Views of  the Vernal Pool Field Site at Parker Charter School, Devens, Ma. 

January 28, 2016
Photos by Judy Gibson



Teacher Judy Gibson noted the low water/ice level at the vernal pool this winter. In one spot,which receives the most sun, there was open water. Most unusual for January!  

The Francis Parker Charter School contributes to both the Vernal Pool and the Our Changing Forests Schoolyard Ecology studies.  


Photos by Sally Farrow


 

Students from Acton-Boxborough and Concord-Carlisle High Schools  serving as Eco Monitors for HF Schoolyard Field sites at Mass Audubon's Drumlin Farm in Lincoln, Ma.  


Drumlin Farm's Eco Monitors are contributing to the Buds, Leaves, and Global Warming and the Vernal Pool Schoolyard Ecology Studies at Ice Pond, Deer Pen pond, and Boyce Pond. 


What does your field site look like this winter? 


Please email photos to Pamela at: psnow@fas.harvard.edu  that can be shared on this blog. 



Tuesday, January 26, 2016

SAVE THE DATE- MARCH 31st-Spring Workshop



Harvard Forest Schoolyard Ecology Spring Workshop for Teachers  

MARCH 31, 2016 


 

Please schedule March 31st, 2016  for our Harvard Forest Schoolyard Ecology Spring Workshop for Teachers. 

Here's some basics on what to expect:   


TITLE OF COURSE: HARVARD FOREST SCHOOLYARD ECOLOGY SPRING WORKSHOP
 
Prerequisite:  Harvard Forest Summer Institute for Teachers

Professional Development Points (PDPs):  6 

Location, Date, Time:
HARVARD FOREST, PETERSHAM, MA;
March 31, 2016
8:30 A.M.-3:00 P.M.

Presenters:
JOHN O'KEEFE: Buds, Leaves, and Global Warming Project Ecologist
DAVID ORWIG: Woolly Bully and the Hemlock Trees Project  Ecologist
BETSY COLBURN:  Vernal Pools Project Ecologist
EMILY SILVER HUFF:  Our Changing Forests, Project Ecologist
5 SCHOOLYARD TEACHERS:  Presentations TBA-stay tuned for details.

Facilitator:
PAMELA SNOW, SCHOOLYARD COORDINATOR

Summary Description:
THE HARVARD FOREST offers a Schoolyard Ecology training workshop for teachers of grades 4-12 and environmental educators who have attended a summer institute and have collected fall data for the Forest Ecology Schoolyard studies.  Professional Forest Ecologists will prepare teachers to implement the spring field study protocols.  All teachers will participate in field walks with project ecologists.  Five experienced Schoolyard teachers will present related curriculum materials and student samples created throughout the school-year.

Goals:
  • To provide further background knowledge of project related themes and processes, in order to enable educators to implement the spring project protocols with students.
  • To encourage teacher networking and sharing of curriculum related to Schoolyard Ecology projects. 

Outcomes:
  • Teachers will be prepared to lead students in implementing spring field protocols. 
  • Teachers will be provided with peer developed curriculum insight, information, materials and/or student samples to aid in teaching project related themes.  

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Teacher Presenters Wanted:  

If you have developed some lesson plans, activities, or other educational resources that you would like to share with other Schoolyard teachers, we have 4 slots open for teacher presenters at our Spring Workshop on March 31st.  

Please contact Pamela Snow by email at:psnow@fas.harvard.edu for more information on what is involved in presenting.








Monday, December 14, 2015

Facing the Challenge of "Looking at Data" Together; Notes and Views from Schoolyard Ecology Data Workshop 2015


Photos by Greta VanScoy
I left the Looking at Data Workshop filled with inspiration and renewed optimism for this work we do together engaging children in schoolyard research.





As you will see from the graphs and comments from our exit survey, teachers seemed share in my optimism.   At the same time, I witnessed some folks who had frustrating moments and found this work to be challenging.  



I want to deeply honor everyone who had the courage to tackle the job of Looking at Data at our teacher workshop on Dec. 3rd at Harvard Forest. 


Teacher Feedback: 

I am just going to share 2 figures from our exit survey that perhaps give the most important feedback on the workshop and then share a range of teacher comments to show both the successes and challenges teachers experienced.  


As you can see above, most teachers went away from the workshop "extremely satisfied".  In thfigurebelow, you can see that while most of our participants felt they made significant progress 
towards their main goals, notice that one participant achieved significantly less progress than the 
others.





The teacher who expressed the least progress towards their goal stated:
  • My goal was ambitious and I had fun getting sidetracked

More teacher comments reflecting the challenges of Looking at Data:

  • The raw data from the field was very disorganized.
  • This was a "wake up" call concerning my data. I was juggling so many other factors (losing trees, student access, safety) that it turns out I did not have as much data to determine growing season as I thought.
  • I need to try and fail and fix, in order to translate the process for my students
  • I wish I had entered the data ahead of time.
  • I entered all of my data, which was a main goal for the day. I had difficulty making charts using Google Sheets because I was unfamiliar with the app. Having someone on hand who is familiar with Sheets would have been handy.


Teacher comments reflecting the successes of Looking at Data:
  • "It was very helpful and it made me more confident in my understanding and usage of the data set. It also made me feel more confident in having my students use the data that they collected."
  • I exceeded my goal and accomplished much more: calculating growing season, data entry of vp and phenology data, introducing Erin to HF and integrating her into the system, opportunity to share and collaborate with teachers and HF staff
  • I have a better idea of the type of data that is available through the LTER database. I can identify reliable sources/complete data sources versus ones that have questionable reliability or ones that are incomplete.
  • I learn more and more each time I come out... I always bring something back to my classroom that I can directly use.
  • Graphs are wonderful and an important way to look at data. Betsy's presentation helped me to understand how to better look at graphs and how important it is to select the right graph for the data. For me graph reading can be challenging so any additional information and support I receive is so important. I suspect I am not the only person out there with graph reading challenges!
Many more  comments are available on the full survey. See link at bottom of this blog entry.

 


Challenges we experienced throughout the day that did not show up in the Survey:
  • A first year teacher who had a high volume of data collected from her students found that there was not sufficient time to organize and submit all of the data in one session.  This is relatively common for first year teachers in the Buds, Leaves and Global Warming project.  While this project is by far our most popular, with very high success rates for data submittal, it is the most time consuming due to the sheer volume of data.  
  • A long time contributor to the Buds and Leaves study was disappointed to find that her data was unable to tell the story of the changing length of the growing season due to a variety of issues with her field site shifts resulting from maintenance dept. tree cutting and snow removal, etc.  Another major obstacle in proved to be  insufficient data at the end of each growing season.
  • Unclear protocol instructions related to showing the end of the growing season for beech and oak trees which often do not drop leaves in the fall was brought out in discussions with project staff. 
  • A Changing Forests teacher found that the student data sheets were lacking important data points/information.  He did not have enough data to create a complete data set for this survey season.    
  • Woolly Bully  teachers found that their one year of  data with zero adelgid yet found was not sufficient to create a meaningful graph. Cross site analysis was attempted but even there, graphing was not particularly worthwhile.  Project Ecologist, David Orwig, responded to these challenges by providing teachers with a broader data set to organize and graph,
  • Technical difficulties on the part of HF staff in transferring and projecting documents from Mac users slowed the final presentation of teacher created graphs.

Teacher Followup:

  • Now that they understand the process, Bud and Leaves new teachers will continue sorting, organizing, and submitting project data and emailing HF staff as questions arise.
  • New Buds and Leaves teachers will have better sense of how to organize project data throughout the field season next time.
  • Experienced Buds and Leaves teacher better understands the importance of sending students out to collect data at the end of the growing season and recording brown and crumpled beech and oak leaves as "fallen" in order to track the length of the growing season.
  • Changing Forests Teacher will be aware of the need to double check student data sheets during field season in order to get a higher quality data set in the future.
Harvard Forest Staff  Follow-up:  
  • We will work on revising the branch to tree level worksheet for easier use by teachers. Look for this in upcoming email notices.
  • We are working on revising protocol materials and email messages to make the protocol for tracking the end of the growing season for oak and beech more clear.
  • We will work to develop some guidelines for Mac users who want to share their graphs/work at HF so that we can project this work without as many interruptions in the future.
  • We will become more familiar with Google Sheets prior to our next Data Workshop in order to better guide teachers using that program.

To see the entire exit survey with many more graphs and comments go to: https://www.surveymonkey.com/results/SM-FQC22VRJ/


Slides from Looking at Data Workshop are posted on our website at:




Stay Tuned for a follow-up document,  Looking at Data; Teacher-Created Graphs and Tables of Harvard Forest Schoolyard Ecology project data.  Look for an update with this document next month. 


THANK YOU to the Harvard Forest Staff  members who contributed to this workshop:  Betsy Colburn, Emery Boose, John O'Keefe, David Orwig, Greta VanScoy, Luca Morreale, Joshua Rapp, Clarisse Hart, Admin. crew, and Woods crew.

Kudos to Hubbard Brook Education representative, Jackie Wilson and NH Project Learning Tree Coordinator, Judy Silverberg for participating in this workshop.

Congratulations to teachers, Melanie McCracken, Louise Levy, Sally Farrow, Maryann Postans, Jana Matthai,  Mary Reed, Colleen Casey, Lori Primavera, Elisa Margarita, Warren Perdrizet, Jessica Farwell, Erin Pitkin, Meghan Lena, Sharon Desjarlais, Emilie Cushing, Thuy Bui, Sue Warburton, Mit Wanzer, and Maria Blewitt for taking your data skills to the next level!!! 


Friday, November 27, 2015

I Give Thanks For All You Contribute to Schoolyard Ecology work!!!



Happy Thanksgiving to all the teachers, students, donors, and Harvard Forest scientists and staff who contribute to our Schoolyard Ecology studies and outreach.  I truly appreciate the manifold ways so many folks add to the larger effort.

Thursday, October 29, 2015

Show us your fall colors!

What are the trees in your neck of the Woods looking like today? Let's take a look at Fall color changing in New England this season

Red Maple in mid October at Harvard Forest

Leaf Color Change From New York to New Hampshire

The Phenocam Network offers us a way of leaf peeping over time and across vast geographical ranges.  

I have put together some images from across the Harvard Forest Schoolyard Ecology region to show you how foliage color varied between September 28th and Oct. 30th, which was when most of the color change occurred in these sites. 

From the Southwestern end of our Region:  



From the Southeast:  



From the Northeast: 



From North Central Massachusetts:



A Bit Further North Central: 





Northern-most View at High Elevation: 





Where does your site fit into this?  Show us your color!  If you have taken any photos of your field site this fall, please email me your photo with the date taken so I can post it here.


Thanks to Maryanne Rotelli from Hollis-Brookline High School for sending these 2 photos:

 Study Branch, 10-06-15


Hollis-Brookline High School Field Site in Southern New Hampshire 10-26-15


More about Fall Foliage:




  • News Article: Dry summer delays peak foliage as trees prep from winter.  Oct. 2015 article from the Worcester Telegram and Gazette including quotes from Harvard Forest Schoolyard Ecologist, John O'Keefe: http://www.telegram article-fall foliage


Thursday, October 15, 2015

Looking at Data Workshop Preview



What to expect in this year’s Working with Data Workshop at Harvard Forest:



How will the day be structured? One workshop will support Schoolyard Ecology teachers with beginning through advanced data management, graphing, and/or analysis skills.  We will convene as one group, spend much of the day in break out groups by skill level (self-determined by teachers) and reconvene at the end of the session  to see advanced teachers share graphs and other products they developed in the session. 

Outcomes: Educators will have materials and knowledge necessary to manage and graph project data.   Educators will have materials to support students in better understanding what the data are revealing about study themes.  Specific outcomes will vary depending on the experience level  and goals of each participant.

When is it?  Thursday, December 3, 2015

Times:   9:00a.m. -3:00p.m.

Who is Invited?     This workshop is intended for teachers who are currently participating in a Harvard Forest Schoolyard Ecology project.  We often accept requests from collaborating non-profit or governmental agencies to attend.

What Level are you?  Teachers will self-assess what levels they would like to work at.  Some guidelines are:

  •    Level 1:   First year Schoolyard teachers who would like to learn how to manage the project data their students began collecting this fall. Information  Manager Emery Boose will provide an overview of Schoolyard Ecology data management and introduce teachers to the online data base.  Teachers will have time to practice inputting this fall’s data on the database, and try graphing data using online graphing tools. Most level 1 teachers will have successfully entered some or all fall project data onto the Harvard Forest database, and go home with a graph created using the online database. 
  •    Level 2:   Teachers will work on structured schoolyard datasets to practice specific graphing skills using Excel. It is possible for teachers to choose to execute the same style graph by hand instead of on Excel if preferred.  While most level 2 teachers will have 1 or more years of schoolyard experience behind them, It is possible for first year schoolyard teachers to begin with level 2 this year as long as they input some fall data prior to confirmation of registration for this workshop. Most level 2 teachers will go home with some graphs of data from other field sites, and the understanding of how to create the same types of graphs using their own data.  Some teachers will have time to begin graphs of their own data.
  • Level 3:   Teachers will work on individual graphing goals with Harvard Forest mentors. Most Level 3 folks will have attended a data level 2 workshop previously. We ask that all level 3 teachers complete the Harvard Forest Schoolyard Ecology graphing exercises prior to this workshop on your own if you haven't participated at level 2 previously.  Graphing in level 3 can be done using Excel or by hand.  Most level 3 teachers will go home with a graph and/or organized data table to work with in the classroom.


PDPs:  Earn 6 PDPs for a 6 hour workshop

Lead Presenter:
BETSY COLBURN,  ECOLOGIST

Support Staff:
EMERY BOOSE, INFORMATION MANAGER
DAVID ORWIG, ECOLOGIST
JOHN O'KEEFE, ECOLOGIST
CLARISSE HART, DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION AND OUTREACH
PAMELA SNOW, SCHOOLYARD COORDINATOR


What does this look like?  

See below for a sense of the graphs Level 2 teachers will learn to create.










Go to our Data Workshop Slide Show about Looking at Data Workshop to see sample tables and graphs and photos from past level 3 sessions.


100% of teacher participants  rated the value of  the time spent working directly on graphing at  this workshop towards their teaching goals as "very useful". 
Teachers said:
  • I was able to produce items that I need to use in the near future and that set the stage for the upcoming season
  • A good use of time that allowed me to get together with other teachers and professionals who are doing the same thing. It's a great time to practice some rusty skills and to bounce ideas off of each other as far as practice and procedures.
  • Learning more and more about excel and the types of data to use and how to use it and even questions to ask the data to answer
  • (Gained) proficiency (in graphing schoolyard data), to the point of being confident that I can translate my skills into clear instructions for my students
More teacher responses on our blog post from last year’s advanced data workshop complete with quotes and graphs of teacher survey responses at: Data Workshop Blog 2014

I hope this helps clarify what the Working with Data Workshop will be like this year. Feel free to respond with any specific questions you may have.


If you want to join us, please  email Pamela at psnow@fas.harvard.edu with the following info:

1.       Your name
2.       Your school
3.       Your Schoolyard project name
4.       What level you would like to participate at (1,2,or 3)
5.       Your individual goal for the workshop